Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunication resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations
Parties with reservations, declarations and objections
Party | Reservations / Declarations | Objections |
---|---|---|
Colombia | Yes | No |
Denmark | Yes | No |
Ireland | Yes | No |
Luxembourg | Yes | No |
Montenegro | Yes | No |
Spain | Yes | No |
Sweden | Yes | No |
United Kingdom | Yes | No |
Venezuela | Yes | No |
Colombia
12-06-2008
The Government of the Republic of Colombia formulates a reservation to paragraph 3 of article 11, by means of which Colombia does not consider itself bound by either of both of the dispute settlement procedures provided for in paragraph 3 of article 11.
Denmark
02-06-2003
In connexion with Denmark's ratification of the Tampere Convention on the Provision
of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations ("the
Convention") Denmark declares that to the extent to which certain provisions of the
Convention fall within the area of responsibility of the European Community, the full
implementation of the Convention by Denmark has to be done in accordance with the
procedures of this international Organisation.
22-07-2003
... Denmark's ratifications normally include the entire Kingdom of Denmark including the Faroe Islands and Greenland. Consequently, no Territorial Application applies in connection with the above-mentioned ratification.
Ireland
16-08-2007
Whereas to the extent to which certain provisions of the Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations ("the Convention") fall within the responsibility of the European Community, the full implementation of the Convention by Ireland has to be done in accordance with the procedures of this international organisation.
Luxembourg
08-06-2012
To the extent to which certain provisions of the Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations fall within the area of responsibility of the European Community, the full implementation of the Convention by Luxembourg has to be done in accordance with the procedures of this international organisation.
Montenegro
21-07-2010
In accordance with Article 14 of the Tampere Convention on the Provisions of Telecommunications
Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations, adopted at Tampere, 18 June
1998, the Government of Montenegro declares that this Convention shall not apply to:
To the extent to which certain provisions of the Tampere Convention on the Provisions
of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations ("the
Convention") fall within the area of responsibility of the European Community, the
full implementation of the Convention by Montenegro has to be done in accordance with
the procedures of this international organization.
Spain
27-02-2006
To the extent to which certain provisions of the Tampere Convention on the Provision
of
Telecommunication Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations fall within
the area of
responsibility of the European Community, Spain cannot implement those decisions unless
the
European Community becomes a party to the Convention.
Sweden
13-09-2004
To the extent to which certain provisions of the Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations fall within the area of responsibility of the European Community, the full implementation of the Convention by Sweden has to be done in accordance with the procedures of this international organisation.
United Kingdom
18-06-2003
To the extent to which certain provisions of the Tampere Convention on the Provisions of Telecommunications Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations ("the Convention") fall within the area of responsibility of the European Community, the full implementation of the Convention by the United Kingdom has to be done in accordance with the procedures of this international organisation.
Venezuela
03-04-2003
Under the provisions of article 11, paragraph 6, of the Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunication Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations (ICET-98), the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela makes a specific reservation to paragraph 3 of that article. It therefore does not consider itself bound by arbitration as a means of dispute settlement, nor does it recognize the binding jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
13-05-2005
Under the provisions of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Tampere Convention on the Provision of Telecommunication Resources for Disaster Mitigation and Relief Operations, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela makes a specific reservation to paragraphs 3 and 4 of article 11. Therefore, it does not consider itself bound by arbitration as a means of dispute settlement, nor does it recognize the binding jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.