Treaty

Protocol of 2005 to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation

Date modified Regarding
06-07-2026 Party

Party

Somalia added

  • Ratification: 26-06-2026 (A)
  • Entry into force: 24-09-2026
  • Reservations / Declarations: No
  • Objections: No

12-05-2025 Party

Party

Cyprus added

  • Ratification: 28-04-2025 (A)
  • Entry into force: 27-07-2025
  • Reservations / Declarations: No
  • Objections: No

28-03-2023 General information, Kingdom part, Party

General information

  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Kingdom part

Netherlands (in Europe)

  • Entry into force: 30-05-2011

Netherlands (Bonaire)

  • Entry into force: 30-05-2011

Netherlands (Sint Eustatius)

  • Entry into force: 30-05-2011

Netherlands (Saba)

  • Entry into force: 30-05-2011

Party

Algeria

  • Ratification: 25-01-2011 (A)
  • Entry into force: 25-04-2011

Antigua and Barbuda

  • Ratification: 24-11-2015 (A)
  • Entry into force: 22-02-2016

Australia

  • Signature: 07-03-2006

Austria

  • Signature: 12-05-2006
  • Ratification: 18-06-2010 (R)
  • Entry into force: 16-09-2010

Barbados

  • Ratification: 08-03-2023 (A)
  • Entry into force: 06-06-2023

Belgium

  • Ratification: 02-07-2019 (A)
  • Entry into force: 30-09-2019

Benin

  • Ratification: 28-06-2018 (A)
  • Entry into force: 26-09-2018

Bulgaria

  • Signature: 11-09-2006
  • Ratification: 07-10-2010 (R)
  • Entry into force: 05-01-2011

Cook Islands

  • Ratification: 12-03-2007 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Côte d'Ivoire

  • Ratification: 23-03-2012 (A)
  • Entry into force: 21-06-2012

Cuba

  • Ratification: 10-04-2014 (A)
  • Entry into force: 09-07-2014

Djibouti

  • Ratification: 23-04-2014 (A)
  • Entry into force: 22-07-2014

Dominican Republic

  • Ratification: 09-03-2010 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Estonia

  • Signature: 08-02-2007
  • Ratification: 16-05-2008 (R)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Fiji

  • Ratification: 21-05-2008 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Ghana

  • Ratification: 18-11-2019 (A)
  • Entry into force: 16-02-2020

Greece

  • Signature: 12-02-2007
  • Ratification: 11-09-2013 (R)
  • Entry into force: 10-12-2013

Guyana

  • Ratification: 20-02-2019 (A)
  • Entry into force: 21-05-2019

Iraq

  • Ratification: 19-07-2021 (A)
  • Entry into force: 17-10-2021

Italy

  • Signature: 01-02-2007

Jamaica

  • Ratification: 28-11-2013 (A)
  • Entry into force: 26-02-2014

Kazakhstan

  • Ratification: 03-05-2019 (A)
  • Entry into force: 01-08-2019

Latvia

  • Ratification: 16-11-2009 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Liechtenstein

  • Ratification: 28-08-2009 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Marshall Islands

  • Ratification: 09-05-2008 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Mauritania

  • Ratification: 21-08-2013 (A)
  • Entry into force: 19-11-2013

Montenegro

  • Ratification: 06-01-2020 (A)
  • Entry into force: 05-04-2020

Nauru

  • Ratification: 29-04-2010 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

New Zealand

  • Signature: 24-01-2007
  • Ratification: 26-02-2018 (R)
  • Entry into force: 27-05-2018
  • Tokelau Islands
    Entry into force: 27-05-2018

Nigeria

  • Ratification: 18-06-2015 (A)
  • Entry into force: 16-09-2015

Norway

  • Signature: 14-02-2006
  • Ratification: 30-09-2013 (R)
  • Entry into force: 29-12-2013

Palau

  • Ratification: 29-09-2011 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-12-2011

Panama

  • Ratification: 24-02-2011 (A)
  • Entry into force: 25-05-2011

Portugal

  • Signature: 14-06-2006
  • Ratification: 01-09-2015 (R)
  • Entry into force: 30-11-2015

Republic of the Congo

  • Ratification: 28-05-2015 (A)
  • Entry into force: 26-08-2015

Saint Kitts and Nevis

  • Ratification: 29-03-2007 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Saint Lucia

  • Ratification: 08-11-2012 (A)
  • Entry into force: 06-02-2013

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

  • Ratification: 05-07-2010 (A)
  • Entry into force: 03-10-2010

San Marino

  • Ratification: 15-12-2014 (A)
  • Entry into force: 15-03-2015

Saudi Arabia

  • Ratification: 31-07-2013 (A)
  • Entry into force: 29-10-2013

Serbia

  • Ratification: 08-07-2010 (A)
  • Entry into force: 06-10-2010

Spain

  • Signature: 12-02-2007
  • Ratification: 16-04-2008 (R)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Togo

  • Ratification: 06-02-2017 (A)
  • Entry into force: 07-05-2017

Türkiye

  • Signature: 15-08-2006
  • Ratification: 19-07-2010 (R)
  • Entry into force: 17-10-2010

United Kingdom

  • Signature: 23-01-2007

Uruguay

  • Ratification: 29-04-2015 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2015

Vanuatu

  • Ratification: 20-08-2008 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010

Denmark

  • Signature: 09-02-2007
  • Ratification: 14-09-2018 (R)
  • Entry into force: 13-12-2018
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    14-09-2018
    Authorization granted by Danish authorities pursuant to article 8bis denotes only that Denmark will abstain from pleading infringement of Danish sovereignty in connection with the requesting State's boarding of a vessel or a platform. Danish authorities cannot authorize another State to take legal action on behalf of the Kingdom of Denmark. Denmark also declares that the Protocol will not extend to the Faroe Islands and Greenland until further notice.


Finland

  • Signature: 27-02-2006
  • Ratification: 26-05-2020 (R)
  • Entry into force: 24-08-2020
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    26-05-2020
    In accordance with article 21, paragraph 3 of the 2005 Protocol to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Finland declares that it will apply the provisions of article 3ter of the Convention, as amended by the 2005 Protocol, in accordance with the principles of its criminal law concerning family exemptions of liability.


France

  • Signature: 14-02-2006
  • Ratification: 09-05-2018 (R)
  • Entry into force: 07-08-2018
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    09-05-2018
    1. Concerning article 4, paragraph 4 of the Protocol replacing article 3, paragraph 2 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the French Republic understands "threatens"/"threat" to mean a threat [Fr. menace] such as it is defined in the conditions provided for by French criminal legislation. 2. Concerning article 4, paragraph 7 of the Protocol, which inserts an article 3quater in the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the French Republic understands "attempts to commit an offence", "participates as an accomplice in an offence" and "organizes [the commission of] an offence" to mean an attempt [Fr. tentative] and participation as an accomplice [Fr. complicité] such as they are defined in the conditions provided for by French criminal legislation. 3. Concerning article 4, paragraph 6 of the Protocol, which inserts an article 3ter in the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, the French Republic reserves the right not to establish as a criminal offence the fact of unlawfully and intentionally transporting another person on board a ship knowing that the person has committed an act that constitutes an offence set forth in article 3, 3bis or 3quater or an offence set forth in any treaty listed in the annex, and intending to assist that person in evading criminal prosecution, where the said person has committed an offence that constitutes a minor offence [Fr. contravention], a misdemeanour [Fr. délit] or an act of terrorism punishable by less than 10 years' imprisonment. In accordance with article 21, paragraph 3 of the Protocol, the French Republic will apply article 3ter of the Convention in accordance with the principles of French criminal law concerning family exemptions of liability. 4. The French Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, as revised by the present Protocol, according to which "Any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which cannot be settled through negotiation within a reasonable time shall, at the request of one of them, be submitted to arbitration. If, within six months from the date of the request for arbitration, the parties are unable to agree on the organization of the arbitration any one of those parties may refer the dispute to the International Court of Justice by request in conformity with the Statute of the Court.


Germany

  • Ratification: 29-01-2016 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-04-2016
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    29-01-2016
    In accordance with Article 21, paragraph 3 of the Protocol, the Federal Republic of Germany declares that it will apply the provisions of Article 3ter in accordance with the principles of German criminal law concerning family exemptions of liability.


Netherlands, the Kingdom of the

  • Signature: 31-01-2007
  • Ratification: 01-03-2011 (R)
  • Entry into force: 30-05-2011
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    01-03-2011
    The Kingdom of the Netherlands declares that it will apply the provisions of article 3ter of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 2005, in accordance with the principles of its criminal law concerning family exemptions of liability.


Qatar

  • Ratification: 10-01-2014 (A)
  • Entry into force: 10-04-2014
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    10-01-2013
    The State of Qatar does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 16 of this Convention with regards to referrals to the International Court of Justice.


Sweden

  • Signature: 14-02-2006
  • Ratification: 22-09-2014 (R)
  • Entry into force: 21-12-2014
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    22-09-2014
    In accordance with article 21.3 of the Protocol of 2005 to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation Sweden will apply article 3ter of the Convention in accordance with the principles of Swedish criminal law concerning family exemptions of liability.


Switzerland

  • Ratification: 15-10-2008 (A)
  • Entry into force: 28-07-2010
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    15-10-2008
    Switzerland declares that article 2bis of the SUA Convention, as contained in the Protocol of 14 October 2005 must not be interpreted as excusing or rendering lawful any acts in other respects unlawful or as excluding the bringing of an action under other legislation.


United States of America

  • Signature: 17-02-2006
  • Ratification: 28-08-2015 (R)
  • Entry into force: 26-11-2015
  • Reservations / Declarations: Yes
  • Objections: No
  • reservation
    28-08-2015
    Consistent with article 16(2) of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 2005, the United States of America declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 16(1) of the Convention with respect to disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the 2005 SUA Protocol. Understandings 1) The United States of America understands that the term "armed conflict" in article 3 of the 2005 SUA Protocol (which adds, inter alia, paragraph 2 of article 2bis to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation) does not include internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence, and other acts of a similar nature. 2) The United States of America understands that the term "international humanitarian law," in article 3 of the 2005 SUA Protocol (which adds, inter alia, paragraph 1 and 2 of article 2bis to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation) has the same substantive meaning as the "law of war." 3) The United States of America understands that, pursuant to article 3 of the 2005 SUA Protocol (which adds, inter alia, paragraph 2 of article 2bis to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation), the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation 2005, does not apply to: (a) the military forces of a State, which are the armed forces of a State organized, trained, and equipped under its internal law for the primary purpose of national defence or security, in the exercise of their official duties; (b) civilians who direct or organize the official activities of military forces of a State; or (c) civilians acting in support of the official activities of the military forces of a State, if the civilians are under the formal command, control, and responsibility of those forces. 4) The United States of America understands that: A. Article 3 and article 4(5) of the 2005 SUA Protocol (which add, inter alia, article 2bis(3) and article 3bis(2), respectively, to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (together referred to as "the NPT savings clauses")) protect from criminal sanction under the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 2005, the transport of source material, special fissionable material, or equipment or material especially designed or prepared for the processing, use, or production of special fissionable material: (i) from the territory of, or otherwise under the control of, a State Party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons ("NPT") to the territory of, or otherwise under the control of, another NPT State Party or a State that is not an NPT party; and (ii) from the territory of, or otherwise under the control of, a state that is not an NPT party to the territory of, or otherwise under the control of, an NPT State Party, where the resulting transfer or receipt of such items or materials is not contrary to the NPT obligations of the NPT State Party. B. The following are illustrative examples of transport of source material, special fissionable material, and equipment or material especially designed or prepared for the processing, use, or production of special fissionable material that would not constitute offenses under the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 2005, by virtue of the savings clauses: (i) Transport of source material or special fissionable material (from either an NPT State Party or a State that is not an NPT party) to an NPT nuclear-weapon State Party, as that term is defined in the NPT, regardless of whether the source material or special fissionable material will be under safeguards in the NPT nuclear-weapon State Party, because the resulting receipt of the material is not contrary to the NPT obligations of the nuclear-weapon State Party; (ii) Transport of source material or special fissionable material to a non-nuclear-weapon State Party, as such term is used in the NPT, for non-nuclear use without safeguards, in accordance with the provisions of the recipient country's IAEA comprehensive safeguards agreement allowing for exemption of the source material or special fissionable material from safeguards or the non-application or termination of safeguards (e.g. for specified de minimis amounts, or for use in a non-proscribed military activity which does not require the application of IAEA safeguards or in a non-nuclear use such as the production of alloys or ceramics); (iii) Transport of source material or special fissionable material or especially designed or prepared equipment, as described in article 4(5) of the 2005 SUA Protocol (which adds article 3bis(1) (b) (iii) to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation), from an NPT State Party to a State that is not an NPT party, so long as the relevant material is for peaceful purposes and placed under IAEA safeguards, consistent with the NPT State Party's obligations under article III.2 of the NPT. If the source or special fissionable material transferred for peaceful purposes is subject to an IAEA safeguards agreement but is not required by that agreement actually to be under safeguards (e.g. under an exemption for de minimis amounts or a provision permitting safeguards termination for non-nuclear use), the transport would not constitute an offense under article 3bis(1) (b) (iii) of the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 2005. 5) The United States of America understands that current United States law with respect to the rights of persons in custody and persons charged with crimes fulfills the requirement in article 9 of the 2005 SUA Protocol and, accordingly, the United States does not intend to enact new legislation to fulfill its obligations under this article.